venus flytrap: be considered plant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.63
, species
Weight: 0.63
, insect
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.57
Siblings housefly
Weight: 0.35
, endangered species
Weight: 0.35
, gypsy moth
Weight: 0.34
, aloe vera
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered plant 1.00
is plant 0.94
is unique plant 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(venus flytrap, be considered plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(aloe vera, is plant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(venus flytrap, be considered plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(aloe vera, is plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(aloe vera, is plant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(venus flytrap, be considered plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(venus flytrap, be considered plant)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(venus flytrap, be considered plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(venus flytrap, is plant)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(venus flytrap, be considered plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(venus flytrap, is plant)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(venus flytrap, be considered plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(venus flytrap, is plant)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(venus flytrap, be considered plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(venus flytrap, is plant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(venus flytrap, be considered plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(venus flytrap, is unique plant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(venus flytrap, be considered plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(venus flytrap, is unique plant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(venus flytrap, be considered plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(venus flytrap, is unique plant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(venus flytrap, be considered plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(venus flytrap, is unique plant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(venus flytrap, be considered plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(venus flytrap, be considered plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(venus flytrap, be considered plant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(venus flytrap, be considered plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(venus flytrap, be considered plant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(venus flytrap, be considered plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(aloe vera, is plant)