vermont: be much more liberal than hampshire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.68
, town
Weight: 0.60
, country
Weight: 0.58
, new mexico
Weight: 0.57
Siblings massachusetts
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.36
, maine
Weight: 0.36
, new york
Weight: 0.35
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be much more liberal than hampshire 1.00
be much more liberal than new hampshire 0.99
is liberal 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(maine, is liberal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is liberal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is liberal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is liberal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(new hampshire, is liberal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is liberal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(massachusetts, is liberal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is liberal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(connecticut, is liberal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is liberal)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(maine, is liberal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(maine, is liberal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(vermont, be much more liberal than new hampshire)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(vermont, be much more liberal than new hampshire)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(vermont, be much more liberal than new hampshire)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vermont, be much more liberal than new hampshire)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(vermont, is liberal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(vermont, is liberal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(vermont, is liberal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(vermont, is liberal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is liberal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is liberal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(connecticut, is liberal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(vermont, be much more liberal than hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(maine, is liberal)