vermont: was state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.68
, town
Weight: 0.60
, country
Weight: 0.58
, new mexico
Weight: 0.57
Siblings massachusetts
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.36
, maine
Weight: 0.36
, new york
Weight: 0.35
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was 14th state 1.00
was state 1.00
has state state 0.92
is state ever 0.83
is blue state 0.79
is best state 0.78
is northern state 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new mexico, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(vermont, was state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new mexico, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(vermont, was state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new mexico, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(new mexico, is blue state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is blue state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maine, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(maine, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is blue state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is blue state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new mexico, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(vermont, was state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new mexico, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(vermont, was state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(connecticut, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(maine, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(maine, has state state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(connecticut, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is best state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(massachusetts, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is blue state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(connecticut, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is blue state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(maine, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(maine, is best state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(vermont, was state)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was 14th state)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(vermont, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vermont, is blue state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vermont, is state ever)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(vermont, is best state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(vermont, has state state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(vermont, was 14th state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(vermont, is northern state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(vermont, is state ever)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(vermont, has state state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(vermont, is state ever)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(vermont, was 14th state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(vermont, is state ever)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(vermont, has state state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(vermont, was 14th state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(vermont, is blue state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(vermont, is best state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(vermont, is northern state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(vermont, is northern state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(vermont, is best state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(vermont, is blue state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vermont, is northern state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(vermont, is best state)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(vermont, is blue state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(vermont, was state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new mexico, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(new mexico, is blue state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(maine, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(connecticut, is blue state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(maine, is best state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is blue state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new mexico, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(vermont, was state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(new mexico, is blue state)