vertebrate: be better than invertebrates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.69
, species
Weight: 0.58
, chordate
Weight: 0.58
, phylum
Weight: 0.57
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.54
Siblings amphibian
Weight: 0.65
, salamander
Weight: 0.63
, human cell
Weight: 0.62
, lamprey
Weight: 0.47
, diatom
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than invertebrates 1.00
be bigger than invertebrates 0.97
be larger than invertebrates 0.96
be like invertebrates 0.96
be much larger than invertebrates 0.96
be different from invertebrates 0.95
be smarter than invertebrates 0.95
be more endangered than invertebrates 0.94
be more complex than invertebrates 0.94
grow larger than invertebrates 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be different from invertebrates)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be bigger than invertebrates)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be larger than invertebrates)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be like invertebrates)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be much larger than invertebrates)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be more endangered than invertebrates)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be smarter than invertebrates)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, grow larger than invertebrates)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be different from invertebrates)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be different from invertebrates)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be different from invertebrates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(vertebrate, grow larger than invertebrates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be much larger than invertebrates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be like invertebrates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be larger than invertebrates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be like invertebrates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be larger than invertebrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be much larger than invertebrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be bigger than invertebrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be like invertebrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be smarter than invertebrates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be larger than invertebrates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, grow larger than invertebrates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(vertebrate, grow larger than invertebrates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be much larger than invertebrates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be smarter than invertebrates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be more endangered than invertebrates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be smarter than invertebrates)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be bigger than invertebrates)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be more endangered than invertebrates)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be bigger than invertebrates)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be more endangered than invertebrates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)