vertebrate: be classified as mammals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.69
, species
Weight: 0.58
, chordate
Weight: 0.58
, phylum
Weight: 0.57
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.54
Siblings amphibian
Weight: 0.65
, salamander
Weight: 0.63
, human cell
Weight: 0.62
, lamprey
Weight: 0.47
, diatom
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be classified as mammals 1.00
is mammals 0.91
be more endangered than invertebrates 0.83
be like invertebrates 0.79
be different from invertebrates 0.79
be different from mollusks arthropods 0.79
be better than invertebrates 0.78
be larger than invertebrates 0.78
be more complex than invertebrates 0.78
be much larger than invertebrates 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(vertebrate, is mammals)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, is mammals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, is mammals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be more endangered than invertebrates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be like invertebrates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be different from mollusks arthropods)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be different from invertebrates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be larger than invertebrates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be much larger than invertebrates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(vertebrate, is mammals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be different from invertebrates)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be different from invertebrates)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be different from invertebrates)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be like invertebrates)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be like invertebrates)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be different from mollusks arthropods)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be different from mollusks arthropods)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be larger than invertebrates)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be more endangered than invertebrates)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be much larger than invertebrates)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be like invertebrates)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be much larger than invertebrates)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be different from mollusks arthropods)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be larger than invertebrates)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be larger than invertebrates)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be much larger than invertebrates)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be more endangered than invertebrates)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be more endangered than invertebrates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be classified as mammals)