vertebrate: be more complex

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.69
, species
Weight: 0.58
, chordate
Weight: 0.58
, phylum
Weight: 0.57
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.54
Siblings amphibian
Weight: 0.65
, salamander
Weight: 0.63
, human cell
Weight: 0.62
, lamprey
Weight: 0.47
, diatom
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more complex 1.00
has state complex 0.91
have complex systems 0.89
be considered complex animals 0.85
have complex nervous systems 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be more complex)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(vertebrate, have complex systems)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(vertebrate, has state complex)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, has state complex)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, have complex systems)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, has state complex)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(vertebrate, has state complex)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(vertebrate, have complex systems)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, have complex nervous systems)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, have complex systems)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(vertebrate, have complex nervous systems)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, have complex nervous systems)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vertebrate, have complex nervous systems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be more complex)