vertebrate: have complex systems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.69
, species
Weight: 0.58
, chordate
Weight: 0.58
, phylum
Weight: 0.57
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.54
Siblings amphibian
Weight: 0.65
, salamander
Weight: 0.63
, human cell
Weight: 0.62
, lamprey
Weight: 0.47
, diatom
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have complex systems 1.00
have complex nervous systems 0.89
be more complex 0.89
has state complex 0.88
has physical part systems 0.86
be considered complex animals 0.82
need system 0.79
have nervous systems 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(vertebrate, have complex systems)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, have complex nervous systems)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, has state complex)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(vertebrate, has state complex)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be more complex)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be considered complex animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, has state complex)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(vertebrate, have complex nervous systems)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(vertebrate, has state complex)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, have complex nervous systems)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be more complex)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vertebrate, have complex nervous systems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, have complex systems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, have complex systems)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(vertebrate, have complex systems)