vet: be called doctor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pet owner
Weight: 0.60
, care
Weight: 0.58
, professional
Weight: 0.57
, time
Weight: 0.56
, expert
Weight: 0.55
Siblings veterinarian
Weight: 0.36
, dentist
Weight: 0.32
, nurse
Weight: 0.32
, trainer
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called doctor 1.00
make less than doctors 0.79
be more expensive than doctors 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vet, be called doctor)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dentist, be called doctor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(vet, be called doctor)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(dentist, be called doctor)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(dentist, be called doctor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(vet, be called doctor)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(vet, be called doctor)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(vet, be called doctor)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(vet, make less than doctors)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(vet, be called doctor)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(vet, be more expensive than doctors)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(vet, be called doctor)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(vet, make less than doctors)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(vet, be called doctor)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(vet, make less than doctors)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(vet, be called doctor)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(vet, be more expensive than doctors)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(vet, be called doctor)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(vet, make less than doctors)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(vet, be called doctor)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(vet, be more expensive than doctors)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(vet, be called doctor)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(vet, be more expensive than doctors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(vet, be called doctor)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(vet, be called doctor)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vet, be called doctor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(vet, be called doctor)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(vet, be called doctor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vet, be called doctor)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dentist, be called doctor)