veterinarian: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.62
, specialist
Weight: 0.61
, scientist
Weight: 0.61
Siblings vet
Weight: 0.36
, physician
Weight: 0.35
, biologist
Weight: 0.34
, dentist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is good job 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dentist, is good job)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(vet, is good job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(veterinarian, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(vet, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(vet, is good job)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(veterinarian, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(dentist, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(dentist, is good job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(veterinarian, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(veterinarian, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(veterinarian, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(veterinarian, is good job)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(veterinarian, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(veterinarian, is good job)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(veterinarian, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, is good job)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(veterinarian, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, is good job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(veterinarian, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(veterinarian, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(veterinarian, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(veterinarian, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dentist, is good job)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vet, is good job)