victim: has physical part rights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.66
, suspect
Weight: 0.63
, member
Weight: 0.62
, woman
Weight: 0.61
Siblings neighbor
Weight: 0.70
, wife
Weight: 0.69
, mother
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part rights 1.00
have important rights 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(suspect, has physical part rights)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(victim, has physical part rights)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(victim, has physical part rights)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(suspect, has physical part rights)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(victim, has physical part rights)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(suspect, has physical part rights)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(suspect, has physical part rights)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(victim, has physical part rights)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(victim, has physical part rights)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(victim, has physical part rights)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(victim, has physical part rights)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(victim, has physical part rights)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(victim, have important rights)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(victim, has physical part rights)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(victim, have important rights)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(victim, has physical part rights)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(victim, have important rights)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(victim, has physical part rights)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(victim, have important rights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(victim, has physical part rights)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(victim, has physical part rights)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(victim, has physical part rights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(victim, has physical part rights)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(victim, has physical part rights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(victim, has physical part rights)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(suspect, has physical part rights)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(victim, has physical part rights)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(suspect, has physical part rights)