victim: return to relationships

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.66
, suspect
Weight: 0.63
, member
Weight: 0.62
, woman
Weight: 0.61
Siblings neighbor
Weight: 0.70
, wife
Weight: 0.69
, mother
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
return to relationships 1.00
stay in relationships 0.90
return to abusive relationships 0.88
stay in violent relationships 0.83
stay in abusive relationships 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, stay in abusive relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(victim, return to relationships)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, stay in abusive relationships)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, stay in abusive relationships)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, stay in abusive relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(victim, return to relationships)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(victim, return to relationships)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(victim, stay in relationships)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(victim, stay in relationships)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(victim, stay in relationships)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(victim, return to abusive relationships)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(victim, stay in violent relationships)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(victim, stay in violent relationships)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(victim, stay in abusive relationships)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(victim, stay in violent relationships)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(victim, stay in violent relationships)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(victim, stay in relationships)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(victim, return to abusive relationships)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(victim, stay in abusive relationships)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(victim, return to abusive relationships)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(victim, return to abusive relationships)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(victim, stay in abusive relationships)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(victim, stay in abusive relationships)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(victim, return to relationships)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(victim, return to relationships)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, stay in abusive relationships)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(victim, return to relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, stay in abusive relationships)