video: is more effective

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents demo
Weight: 0.65
, electronic device
Weight: 0.63
, digital camera
Weight: 0.62
, demonstration
Weight: 0.62
Siblings television show
Weight: 0.68
, television series
Weight: 0.62
, minute
Weight: 0.61
, webcam
Weight: 0.58
, tube
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more effective 1.00
is effective 0.96
be more effective than text 0.87
is effective communication 0.85
is more convenient 0.78
need accurate 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(demonstration, is effective)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(video, is more effective)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(demonstration, is effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(demonstration, is effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is more convenient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(minute, need accurate)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(demonstration, is effective)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(video, is more effective)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(minute, need accurate)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(minute, need accurate)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(webcam, is more convenient)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(webcam, is more convenient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(video, is more effective)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(video, be more effective than text)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(video, be more effective than text)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(video, be more effective than text)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(video, be more effective than text)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(video, is more effective)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(video, is more effective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(demonstration, is effective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(minute, need accurate)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(webcam, is more convenient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(video, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(demonstration, is effective)