view: were different in regards

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.63
, picture
Weight: 0.61
, image
Weight: 0.61
, part
Weight: 0.61
Siblings opinion
Weight: 0.64
, top
Weight: 0.58
, functionalism
Weight: 0.49
, realist
Weight: 0.36
, picture frame
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
were different in regards 1.00
were different in regards to constitution 0.86
differ among people 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(view, were different in regards)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(view, were different in regards)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(view, were different in regards)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(view, were different in regards to constitution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(view, were different in regards)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(view, were different in regards to constitution)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(view, were different in regards)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(view, were different in regards to constitution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(view, were different in regards)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(view, differ among people)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(view, were different in regards)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(view, differ among people)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(view, were different in regards)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(view, differ among people)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(view, were different in regards)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(view, were different in regards to constitution)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(view, were different in regards)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(view, differ among people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(view, were different in regards)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(view, were different in regards)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(view, were different in regards)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(view, were different in regards)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(view, were different in regards)