vinyl: be considered better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.68
, substrate
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.60
, printing
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pvc
Weight: 0.61
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.36
, acetate
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, shellac
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered better 1.00
be considered superior 0.84
is better quality 0.82
has quality better 0.79
is better sound quality 0.77
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered better)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered superior)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(vinyl, is better quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(vinyl, is better quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is better quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered superior)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is best)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(vinyl, is best)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered better)