vinyl: be considered better over digital lossless

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.68
, substrate
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.60
, printing
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pvc
Weight: 0.61
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.36
, acetate
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, shellac
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered better over digital lossless 1.00
be considered better over lossless 0.97
be better than digital 0.84
be considered superior to digital recordings 0.83
compare to digital music 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be better than digital)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(vinyl, compare to digital music)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vinyl, be better than digital)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be better than digital)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vinyl, compare to digital music)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(vinyl, be better than digital)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, compare to digital music)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(vinyl, compare to digital music)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)