vinyl: be considered better over lossless

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.68
, substrate
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.60
, printing
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pvc
Weight: 0.61
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.36
, acetate
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, shellac
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered better over lossless 1.00
be considered better over digital lossless 0.97
be considered superior to digital recordings 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered better over lossless)