vinyl: be considered superior

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.68
, substrate
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.60
, printing
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pvc
Weight: 0.61
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.36
, acetate
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, shellac
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered superior 1.00
is superior 0.95
be considered better 0.84
be considered superior to recordings 0.82
be considered superior to digital recordings 0.77
is better quality 0.77
is best quality 0.76
is best sound quality 0.76
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered superior)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(vinyl, is superior)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is superior)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(vinyl, is superior)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered superior to recordings)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is superior)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(vinyl, is better quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(vinyl, is better quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(vinyl, is best quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is better quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is best quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered superior to recordings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior to recordings)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior to recordings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered superior)