vinyl: be more expensive than cd

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.68
, substrate
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.60
, printing
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pvc
Weight: 0.61
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.36
, acetate
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, shellac
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than cd 1.00
be better than cd 0.95
be better than cds 0.86
have oddments ' expensive copies 0.77
have oddments ' expensive copies of 0.77
is expensive 0.76
be more expensive than laminate 0.76
have expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(printing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(printing, is expensive)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(printing, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pvc, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(shellac, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(printing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(shellac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(shellac, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(pvc, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pvc, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be better than cd)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be better than cds)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, have oddments ' expensive copies)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, have oddments ' expensive copies of)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(vinyl, have oddments ' expensive copies)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(vinyl, be better than cd)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(vinyl, be better than cds)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(vinyl, be better than cd)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(vinyl, have oddments ' expensive copies)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vinyl, be better than cds)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(vinyl, have oddments ' expensive copies)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(vinyl, have oddments ' expensive copies of)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be better than cd)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(vinyl, have oddments ' expensive copies of)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be better than cds)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, have expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(vinyl, have oddments ' expensive copies of)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(vinyl, have expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vinyl, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(vinyl, have expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is expensive)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(vinyl, have expensive)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(vinyl, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(printing, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(shellac, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pvc, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(printing, is expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)