vinyl: be more expensive than laminate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.68
, substrate
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.60
, printing
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pvc
Weight: 0.61
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.36
, acetate
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, shellac
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than laminate 1.00
is flooring expensive 0.83
be good flooring 0.77
is flooring unique 0.76
is flooring 0.76
be more expensive than cd 0.76
be bad flooring 0.76
have expensive 0.76
is expensive 0.75
is flooring toxic 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(printing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(printing, is expensive)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(printing, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pvc, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(shellac, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(printing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(shellac, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(shellac, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(pvc, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pvc, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is flooring)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(vinyl, is flooring)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is flooring)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is flooring unique)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be good flooring)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(vinyl, be good flooring)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(vinyl, is flooring unique)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is flooring expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(vinyl, is flooring)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be bad flooring)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than cd)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be good flooring)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is flooring unique)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is flooring toxic)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(vinyl, be good flooring)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(vinyl, is flooring unique)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(vinyl, be bad flooring)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vinyl, is flooring expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(vinyl, be bad flooring)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, have expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vinyl, is flooring toxic)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(vinyl, is flooring expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be bad flooring)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(vinyl, have expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vinyl, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(vinyl, is flooring toxic)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is flooring expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is flooring toxic)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(vinyl, have expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is expensive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(vinyl, have expensive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(vinyl, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(printing, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(shellac, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pvc, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(printing, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(vinyl, be more expensive than laminate)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)