vinyl: compare to digital music

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.68
, substrate
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.60
, printing
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pvc
Weight: 0.61
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.36
, acetate
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, shellac
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare to digital music 1.00
compare to music 0.90
be better than digital 0.85
be considered superior to digital recordings 0.84
play music 0.81
be considered better over digital lossless 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(vinyl, compare to digital music)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(vinyl, compare to music)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be better than digital)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(vinyl, be better than digital)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vinyl, be better than digital)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be better than digital)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered superior to digital recordings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(vinyl, compare to music)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vinyl, play music)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(vinyl, compare to music)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(vinyl, play music)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, compare to music)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered better over digital lossless)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(vinyl, play music)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, play music)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, compare to digital music)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(vinyl, compare to digital music)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vinyl, compare to digital music)