vinyl: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.68
, substrate
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.60
, printing
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pvc
Weight: 0.61
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.36
, acetate
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, shellac
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is quality 0.87
is better quality 0.87
is best quality 0.85
is better sound quality 0.82
is best sound quality 0.82
be bad for environment 0.80
is sound quality 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(printing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(printing, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(printing, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(acetate, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(pvc, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pvc, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(printing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(acetate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(acetate, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(pvc, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(pvc, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(pvc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pvc, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(vinyl, is quality)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(vinyl, is better quality)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best quality)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(vinyl, is better quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(vinyl, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is better quality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(vinyl, is best quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(vinyl, is quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(vinyl, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(vinyl, is sound quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is best quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is sound quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(vinyl, is sound quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is sound quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(printing, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(acetate, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pvc, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pvc, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(printing, has quality bad)