vinyl: is best sound quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.68
, substrate
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.60
, printing
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pvc
Weight: 0.61
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.36
, acetate
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, shellac
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best sound quality 1.00
is better sound quality 0.95
is sound quality 0.95
is best quality 0.92
is better quality 0.86
has quality good 0.86
is quality 0.86
has quality better 0.84
is best 0.83
has quality bad 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(printing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(printing, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(printing, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(acetate, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(pvc, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pvc, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(printing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(acetate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(acetate, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(pvc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pvc, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(pvc, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(pvc, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(vinyl, is sound quality)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best quality)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(vinyl, is better quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(vinyl, is best quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is sound quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(vinyl, is quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is sound quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is best quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(vinyl, is sound quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(vinyl, is better quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is better quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(vinyl, is quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is best)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(vinyl, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(printing, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(acetate, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pvc, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pvc, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(printing, has quality bad)