vinyl: is better sound quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.68
, substrate
Weight: 0.65
, format
Weight: 0.60
, printing
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pvc
Weight: 0.61
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.36
, acetate
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, shellac
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is better sound quality 1.00
is sound quality 0.96
is best sound quality 0.95
is better quality 0.91
has quality better 0.89
has quality good 0.86
is quality 0.85
is best quality 0.83
has quality bad 0.82
be considered better 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(printing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(printing, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(printing, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(acetate, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(pvc, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pvc, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(printing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(acetate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(acetate, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(pvc, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pvc, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(pvc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(pvc, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(vinyl, is better sound quality)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(vinyl, is sound quality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(vinyl, is better quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is sound quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is best quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is sound quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(vinyl, is better quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(vinyl, is quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(vinyl, is best quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is better quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(vinyl, is sound quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(vinyl, is best sound quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(vinyl, is best quality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is best quality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(vinyl, be considered better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(vinyl, is quality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(vinyl, is quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, be considered better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(vinyl, be considered better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(vinyl, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(vinyl, be considered better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(printing, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(acetate, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pvc, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pvc, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vinyl, is better sound quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(printing, has quality bad)