viola: davis regret doing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stringed instrument
Weight: 0.72
, character
Weight: 0.62
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.59
, chamber music
Weight: 0.55
, brass instrument
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cello
Weight: 0.41
, violin
Weight: 0.41
, piano
Weight: 0.39
, lute
Weight: 0.39
, mandolin
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
davis regret doing 1.00
davis regret 0.97
be different from mr slater 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(character, be different from mr slater)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(viola, davis regret doing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(viola, davis regret doing)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(character, be different from mr slater)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(viola, davis regret doing)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(character, be different from mr slater)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(character, be different from mr slater)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(viola, davis regret doing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(viola, davis regret doing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(viola, davis regret doing)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(viola, davis regret doing)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(viola, davis regret doing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(viola, davis regret)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(viola, davis regret doing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(viola, davis regret)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(viola, davis regret doing)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(viola, davis regret)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(viola, davis regret doing)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(viola, davis regret)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(viola, davis regret doing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(viola, davis regret doing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(viola, davis regret doing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(viola, davis regret doing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(viola, davis regret doing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(viola, davis regret doing)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(character, be different from mr slater)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(viola, davis regret doing)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(character, be different from mr slater)