violence: solve problems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents atrocity
Weight: 0.68
, tragedy
Weight: 0.64
, crime
Weight: 0.63
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.62
Siblings poverty
Weight: 0.67
, fire
Weight: 0.62
, robbery
Weight: 0.59
, killing
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
solve problems 1.00
has state problem 0.81
is social problem 0.80
be problem in society 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(violence, solve problems)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(violence, solve problems)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, is social problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crime, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(crime, has state problem)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(robbery, is social problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(violence, solve problems)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(violence, solve problems)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(robbery, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(robbery, is social problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robbery, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(robbery, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(violence, solve problems)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(violence, is social problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(violence, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(violence, be problem in society)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(violence, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(violence, be problem in society)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(violence, be problem in society)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(violence, is social problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(violence, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(violence, is social problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(violence, is social problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(violence, be problem in society)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(violence, solve problems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(violence, solve problems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(robbery, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(violence, solve problems)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)