visa card: be at walett

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents card
Weight: 0.68
, prize
Weight: 0.55
, credit
Weight: 0.53
, service
Weight: 0.49
, account
Weight: 0.45
Siblings credit card
Weight: 0.71
, wild card
Weight: 0.38
, debit card
Weight: 0.37
, business card
Weight: 0.37
, index card
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at walett 1.00
be at poket 1.00
be at rolladex 1.00
be at wakket 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(visa card, be at walett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(debit card, be at poket)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(visa card, be at walett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(index card, be at rolladex)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(visa card, be at walett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be at wakket)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(visa card, be at walett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(index card, be at rolladex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(index card, be at rolladex)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(visa card, be at walett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(credit card, be at wakket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(credit card, be at wakket)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(visa card, be at walett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(debit card, be at poket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(debit card, be at poket)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(visa card, be at walett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(visa card, be at walett)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(visa card, be at walett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(visa card, be at walett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(visa card, be at walett)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(visa card, be at walett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(visa card, be at walett)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(visa card, be at walett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(credit card, be at wakket)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(visa card, be at walett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(debit card, be at poket)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(visa card, be at walett) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(index card, be at rolladex)