visa: be more popular than mastercard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.62
, debit card
Weight: 0.61
, credit card
Weight: 0.60
, travel
Weight: 0.59
Siblings business card
Weight: 0.34
, travel agent
Weight: 0.33
, smart card
Weight: 0.33
, travel agency
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more popular than mastercard 1.00
be more expensive than usa 0.83
be popular in usa 0.80
be more popular in europe 0.80
be expensive for uk 0.79
be more convenient than debit cards 0.77
be considered more popular than debit cards 0.77
be expensive in canada 0.77
be cheaper in eu 0.76
be more expensive in japan 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(travel, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(credit card, be considered more popular than debit cards)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(credit card, be more convenient than debit cards)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(visa, be more popular than mastercard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(credit card, be more convenient than debit cards)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(credit card, be considered more popular than debit cards)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(travel, be expensive in canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(travel, be expensive in canada)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be more convenient than debit cards)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be considered more popular than debit cards)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(smart card, be more popular in europe)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(travel, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(credit card, be considered more popular than debit cards)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(credit card, be more convenient than debit cards)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(visa, be more popular than mastercard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(smart card, be more popular in europe)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(smart card, be more popular in europe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(visa, be more popular than mastercard)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(visa, be expensive for uk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(visa, be expensive for uk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(visa, be expensive for uk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(visa, be expensive for uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(visa, be more popular than mastercard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(visa, be more popular than mastercard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(credit card, be more convenient than debit cards)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(credit card, be considered more popular than debit cards)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(travel, be expensive in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(smart card, be more popular in europe)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(credit card, be more convenient than debit cards)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(credit card, be considered more popular than debit cards)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(visa, be more popular than mastercard)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(travel, be expensive in canada)