vision: get we age

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.67
, ability
Weight: 0.63
, example
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.60
, technology
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ambition
Weight: 0.35
, passion
Weight: 0.35
, dedication
Weight: 0.34
, commitment
Weight: 0.34
, creativity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
get we age 1.00
get better with age 0.87
get with age 0.86
get over time 0.77
improve with age 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(vision, get we age)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(vision, get better with age)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(vision, get better with age)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(vision, get better with age)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(vision, get with age)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(vision, get over time)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(vision, get with age)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(vision, get better with age)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(vision, get over time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(vision, get over time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(vision, get with age)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(vision, get over time)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(vision, improve with age)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(vision, get with age)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(vision, improve with age)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(vision, improve with age)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(vision, improve with age)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vision, get we age)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(vision, get we age)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(vision, get we age)