volatility: be related in investment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, risk
Weight: 0.56
, characteristic
Weight: 0.55
, stock market
Weight: 0.55
Siblings weakness
Weight: 0.33
, valuation
Weight: 0.32
, decline
Weight: 0.32
, capitalization
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related in investment 1.00
interact with areas of investments 0.81
related to allocation in economy 0.80
be related to stock market 0.80
be related 0.80
related to allocation economy 0.80
related to allocation of resources in economy 0.79
related to allocation resources economy 0.79
be important for investors 0.78
be related to profit 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(characteristic, be related)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(volatility, be related in investment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(volatility, be related in investment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(problem, related to allocation resources economy)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(volatility, be related in investment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(problem, related to allocation of resources in economy)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(volatility, be related in investment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(risk, be related to profit)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(volatility, be related in investment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(risk, be related to profit)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(problem, related to allocation of resources in economy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(problem, related to allocation resources economy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(characteristic, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(risk, be related to profit)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(problem, related to allocation of resources in economy)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(problem, related to allocation resources economy)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, be related)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(characteristic, be related)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(volatility, be related in investment)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(volatility, be related in investment)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(problem, related to allocation resources economy)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(volatility, be related in investment)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(problem, related to allocation of resources in economy)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(volatility, be related in investment)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(risk, be related to profit)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(volatility, be related in investment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(volatility, be related in investment)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(volatility, be related)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(volatility, be important for investors)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(volatility, be related)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(volatility, be related)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(volatility, be important for investors)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(volatility, be important for investors)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(volatility, be related)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(volatility, be important for investors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(volatility, be related in investment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(risk, be related to profit)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(problem, related to allocation resources economy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(problem, related to allocation of resources in economy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(characteristic, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(risk, be related to profit)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(characteristic, be related)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(problem, related to allocation of resources in economy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(volatility, be related in investment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(problem, related to allocation resources economy)