volatility: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, risk
Weight: 0.56
, characteristic
Weight: 0.55
, stock market
Weight: 0.55
Siblings weakness
Weight: 0.33
, valuation
Weight: 0.32
, decline
Weight: 0.32
, capitalization
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
has quality worth 0.82
minimise bad thing 0.78
do good 0.78
take bad 0.78
be high in bad economy 0.77
has quality definition 0.75
help poor 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stock market, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(stock market, do good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(stock market, be high in bad economy)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(risk, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(volatility, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(risk, take bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(stock market, be high in bad economy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(stock market, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(stock market, do good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(risk, take bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(stock market, be high in bad economy)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stock market, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(stock market, do good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decline, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(valuation, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality worse)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stock market, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(risk, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(stock market, do good)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(stock market, be high in bad economy)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(valuation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(valuation, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(weakness, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(weakness, has quality worse)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(decline, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(decline, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(volatility, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(volatility, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(risk, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(risk, minimise bad thing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(risk, take bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(stock market, be high in bad economy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(stock market, do good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(stock market, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality worse)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(valuation, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(decline, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(risk, has quality worth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(risk, minimise bad thing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(risk, take bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(stock market, be high in bad economy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(stock market, do good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(stock market, has quality good)