vole: has physical part hole

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.60
, rodent
Weight: 0.55
, prey
Weight: 0.55
, mammal
Weight: 0.54
, wildlife
Weight: 0.50
Siblings otter
Weight: 0.36
, squirrel
Weight: 0.35
, lizard
Weight: 0.35
, tree frog
Weight: 0.35
, beaver
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part hole 1.00
has physical part holes 0.95
dig holes 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(vole, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lizard, dig holes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(vole, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(lizard, dig holes)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(lizard, dig holes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(vole, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(vole, has physical part hole)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(vole, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(vole, has physical part holes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(vole, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vole, has physical part holes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(vole, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(vole, dig holes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(vole, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(vole, dig holes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(vole, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(vole, has physical part holes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(vole, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(vole, dig holes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(vole, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(vole, has physical part holes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(vole, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(vole, dig holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(vole, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(vole, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(vole, has physical part hole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(vole, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(vole, has physical part hole)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(vole, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lizard, dig holes)