voltage: be in when more transformer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.65
, specification
Weight: 0.64
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings volt
Weight: 0.75
, capacitor
Weight: 0.65
, bias
Weight: 0.61
, output
Weight: 0.56
, jitter
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in when more transformer 1.00
be in when transformer 0.99
be in more transformer 0.98
be in transformer 0.96
increases in transformer 0.89
be used in transmission of electricity 0.78
be used for power transmission 0.76
have voltage 0.75
have same voltage 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(voltage, be in when more transformer)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(capacitor, have same voltage)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(voltage, be in when more transformer)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(capacitor, have same voltage)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(capacitor, have same voltage)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(voltage, be in when more transformer)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(voltage, be in when more transformer)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(voltage, be in when more transformer)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(voltage, be in transformer)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(voltage, be in when more transformer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(voltage, be in transformer)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(voltage, be in when more transformer)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(voltage, be in transformer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(voltage, be in when more transformer)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(voltage, be in transformer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(voltage, be in when more transformer)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(voltage, increases in transformer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(voltage, be in when more transformer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(voltage, increases in transformer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(voltage, be in when more transformer)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(voltage, increases in transformer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(voltage, be in when more transformer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(voltage, increases in transformer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(voltage, be in when more transformer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(voltage, be in when more transformer)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(voltage, be in when more transformer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(voltage, be in when more transformer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(voltage, be in when more transformer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(voltage, be in when more transformer)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(capacitor, have same voltage)