voltage: be inversely proportional to current

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.65
, specification
Weight: 0.64
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings volt
Weight: 0.75
, capacitor
Weight: 0.65
, bias
Weight: 0.61
, output
Weight: 0.56
, jitter
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be inversely proportional to current 1.00
be inversely proportional to capacitance 0.88
be directly proportional to current 0.87
be directly proportional to resistance 0.81
is correlated 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(variable, is correlated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(voltage, be inversely proportional to current)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(voltage, be inversely proportional to current) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(variable, is correlated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(voltage, be inversely proportional to current) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(variable, is correlated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(variable, is correlated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(voltage, be inversely proportional to current) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(voltage, be inversely proportional to current)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(voltage, be inversely proportional to current) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(voltage, be inversely proportional to current)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(voltage, be inversely proportional to current) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(voltage, be directly proportional to current)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(voltage, be inversely proportional to current) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(voltage, be directly proportional to current)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(voltage, be inversely proportional to current) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(voltage, be directly proportional to current)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(voltage, be inversely proportional to current) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(voltage, be directly proportional to current)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(voltage, be inversely proportional to current) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(voltage, be inversely proportional to current) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(voltage, be inversely proportional to current)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(voltage, be inversely proportional to current) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(voltage, be inversely proportional to current)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(voltage, be inversely proportional to current) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(variable, is correlated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(voltage, be inversely proportional to current) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(variable, is correlated)