voltage: increases in transformer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.65
, specification
Weight: 0.64
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings volt
Weight: 0.75
, capacitor
Weight: 0.65
, bias
Weight: 0.61
, output
Weight: 0.56
, jitter
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
increases in transformer 1.00
be in transformer 0.91
be in more transformer 0.90
be in when transformer 0.90
be in when more transformer 0.89
increase voltage 0.80
be increased in transmission 0.78
be increased in cables 0.78
be used in transmission of electricity 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(capacitor, increase voltage)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(capacitor, increase voltage)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(capacitor, increase voltage)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(voltage, increases in transformer)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(voltage, be in transformer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(voltage, be in transformer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(voltage, be in transformer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(voltage, be in when more transformer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(voltage, be in transformer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(voltage, be increased in cables)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(voltage, be increased in transmission)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(voltage, be in when more transformer)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(voltage, be increased in cables)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(voltage, be increased in cables)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(voltage, be increased in cables)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(voltage, be increased in transmission)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(voltage, be increased in transmission)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(voltage, be increased in transmission)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(voltage, be in when more transformer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(voltage, be in when more transformer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(voltage, increases in transformer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(voltage, increases in transformer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(voltage, increases in transformer)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(capacitor, increase voltage)