vote: be distributed in united nations general assembly

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.67
, majority
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings general election
Weight: 0.69
, ballot
Weight: 0.54
, dissent
Weight: 0.50
, turnout
Weight: 0.43
, amendment
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be distributed in united nations general assembly 1.00
be distributed in united nations assembly 0.98
be distributed in nations general assembly 0.97
be distributed in nations assembly 0.95
compare to elections in other democracies 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(turnout, compare to elections in other democracies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(turnout, compare to elections in other democracies)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(turnout, compare to elections in other democracies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(vote, be distributed in united nations assembly)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(vote, be distributed in nations general assembly)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(vote, be distributed in united nations assembly)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(vote, be distributed in nations assembly)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(vote, be distributed in nations general assembly)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(vote, be distributed in nations assembly)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(vote, be distributed in united nations assembly)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vote, be distributed in nations general assembly)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(vote, be distributed in nations assembly)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(vote, be distributed in nations general assembly)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(vote, be distributed in united nations assembly)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(vote, be distributed in nations assembly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(turnout, compare to elections in other democracies)