vote: be example of direct democracy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.67
, majority
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings general election
Weight: 0.69
, ballot
Weight: 0.54
, dissent
Weight: 0.50
, turnout
Weight: 0.43
, amendment
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be example of direct democracy 1.00
be example of democracy 0.95
be important for democracy 0.90
be important in democracy 0.90
be important to democracy 0.89
be important in representative democracy 0.86
be essential for democratic society 0.83
compare to elections in other democracies 0.79
compare to elections in democracies 0.79
be counted in democratic primary 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(dissent, be essential for democratic society)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dissent, be important for democracy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(turnout, compare to elections in democracies)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(turnout, compare to elections in other democracies)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dissent, be important to democracy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(turnout, be important in democracy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(turnout, be important in representative democracy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ballot, be important for democracy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ballot, be important for democracy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ballot, be important for democracy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dissent, be important to democracy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(dissent, be important to democracy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(turnout, be important in democracy)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(turnout, be important in democracy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(dissent, be important for democracy)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(dissent, be important for democracy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(turnout, be important in representative democracy)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(turnout, be important in representative democracy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(dissent, be essential for democratic society)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(dissent, be essential for democratic society)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(turnout, compare to elections in democracies)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(turnout, compare to elections in democracies)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(turnout, compare to elections in other democracies)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(turnout, compare to elections in other democracies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(vote, be example of direct democracy)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(vote, be example of democracy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of democracy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(vote, be example of democracy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vote, be example of democracy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(vote, be counted in democratic primary)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(vote, be counted in democratic primary)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(vote, be counted in democratic primary)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(vote, be counted in democratic primary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(vote, be example of direct democracy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dissent, be essential for democratic society)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dissent, be important to democracy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ballot, be important for democracy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(dissent, be important for democracy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(turnout, compare to elections in democracies)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(turnout, be important in democracy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(turnout, be important in representative democracy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be example of direct democracy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(turnout, compare to elections in other democracies)