vote: be for parties viewed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.67
, majority
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings general election
Weight: 0.69
, ballot
Weight: 0.54
, dissent
Weight: 0.50
, turnout
Weight: 0.43
, amendment
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for parties viewed 1.00
be for third parties viewed 0.95
be for parties 0.90
be for third parties 0.85
be considered world-level 0.78
display political party 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(event, be considered world-level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(vote, be for parties viewed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(event, be considered world-level)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(event, be considered world-level)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ballot, display political party)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(event, be considered world-level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(vote, be for parties viewed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ballot, display political party) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ballot, display political party)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(vote, be for parties viewed)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(vote, be for third parties viewed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(vote, be for parties)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vote, be for third parties viewed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(vote, be for parties)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(vote, be for third parties viewed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(vote, be for third parties)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vote, be for third parties viewed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(vote, be for third parties)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(vote, be for parties)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(vote, be for third parties)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(vote, be for parties)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(vote, be for third parties)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vote, be for parties viewed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(vote, be for parties viewed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(event, be considered world-level)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(ballot, display political party)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(vote, be for parties viewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(event, be considered world-level)