vote: be for third parties viewed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.67
, majority
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings general election
Weight: 0.69
, ballot
Weight: 0.54
, dissent
Weight: 0.50
, turnout
Weight: 0.43
, amendment
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for third parties viewed 1.00
be for parties viewed 0.95
be for third parties 0.93
be for parties 0.87
be considered world-level 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(event, be considered world-level)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vote, be for third parties viewed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(event, be considered world-level)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(event, be considered world-level)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(event, be considered world-level)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(vote, be for third parties viewed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(vote, be for third parties viewed)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(vote, be for parties viewed)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(vote, be for third parties)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(vote, be for third parties)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(vote, be for parties viewed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(vote, be for parties viewed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(vote, be for parties)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(vote, be for parties)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(vote, be for third parties)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(vote, be for parties)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vote, be for parties viewed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(vote, be for third parties)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(vote, be for parties)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vote, be for third parties viewed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vote, be for third parties viewed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(event, be considered world-level)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(vote, be for third parties viewed)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(event, be considered world-level)