vote: be needed in elections

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.67
, majority
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings general election
Weight: 0.69
, ballot
Weight: 0.54
, dissent
Weight: 0.50
, turnout
Weight: 0.43
, amendment
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed in elections 1.00
be important to elections 0.96
be in elections 0.96
be in elections high 0.93
be important to free elections 0.93
be low in us elections 0.91
compare to elections 0.88
be counted for election 0.87
be counted for presidential election 0.87
were counted in presidential election 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(turnout, be low in us elections)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ballot, were counted in presidential election)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(turnout, be in elections high)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(turnout, be in elections)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(turnout, compare to elections)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(ballot, be important to free elections)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ballot, be important to elections)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(ballot, be important to elections)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(ballot, be important to elections)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(turnout, be in elections)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(turnout, be in elections)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(ballot, be important to free elections)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(ballot, be important to free elections)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(turnout, be in elections high)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(turnout, be in elections high)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(turnout, be low in us elections)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(turnout, be low in us elections)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(turnout, compare to elections)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(turnout, compare to elections)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ballot, were counted in presidential election)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(ballot, were counted in presidential election)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(vote, be needed in elections)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(vote, be counted for election)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(vote, be counted for presidential election)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(vote, be counted for election)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(vote, be counted for presidential election)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(vote, be counted for election)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(vote, be counted for presidential election)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(vote, be counted for presidential election)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(vote, be counted for election)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(vote, be needed in elections)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(ballot, be important to elections)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ballot, be important to free elections)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(turnout, compare to elections)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(turnout, be low in us elections)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(turnout, be in elections)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(turnout, be in elections high)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed in elections)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ballot, were counted in presidential election)