voter: be i d laws constitutional

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.60
, source
Weight: 0.56
, turnout
Weight: 0.56
, other people
Weight: 0.55
, step
Weight: 0.54
Siblings homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, elderly person
Weight: 0.33
, one person
Weight: 0.33
, candidate
Weight: 0.33
, other person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be i d laws constitutional 1.00
be i d laws 0.94
is i d laws 0.94
is i d laws good 0.93
is i d laws considered 0.93
is i d laws bad 0.93
is i d law 0.93
is i d laws controversial 0.92
is i d laws seen 0.92
is i d laws bad for democrats 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(voter, be i d laws constitutional)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(voter, is i d laws)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d laws bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d laws good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d laws)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d laws bad for democrats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d laws)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(voter, is i d laws)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(voter, is i d laws bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(voter, is i d laws bad for democrats)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(voter, is i d laws good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d laws bad for democrats)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d laws bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(voter, is i d laws bad for democrats)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d laws good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(voter, is i d laws bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(voter, is i d laws good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(voter, be i d laws constitutional)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(voter, be i d laws constitutional)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(voter, be i d laws constitutional)