voter: be i d laws discriminatory

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.60
, source
Weight: 0.56
, turnout
Weight: 0.56
, other people
Weight: 0.55
, step
Weight: 0.54
Siblings homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, elderly person
Weight: 0.33
, one person
Weight: 0.33
, candidate
Weight: 0.33
, other person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be i d laws discriminatory 1.00
is i d discriminatory 0.97
is d discriminatory 0.94
be i d laws racist 0.93
is i d laws racist 0.93
is i d laws discriminating 0.92
be i d laws 0.91
is i d laws bad 0.90
is i d laws 0.90
is i d laws good 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(voter, is i d laws)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(voter, is i d discriminatory)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d discriminatory)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(voter, is i d discriminatory)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d laws racist)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(voter, be i d laws racist)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(voter, is i d laws racist)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d laws)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d discriminatory)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(voter, be i d laws racist)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(voter, is i d laws discriminating)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d laws racist)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(voter, be i d laws racist)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(voter, is i d laws)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d laws discriminating)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d laws bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(voter, is i d laws bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(voter, is i d laws racist)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(voter, is i d laws discriminating)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d laws bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(voter, be i d laws racist)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(voter, is i d laws bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(voter, is i d laws good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d laws good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d laws discriminating)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(voter, is i d laws good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d laws good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d laws)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(voter, be i d laws discriminatory)