voting: is big issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.61
, privilege
Weight: 0.57
, time
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, action
Weight: 0.57
Siblings poll
Weight: 0.31
, bullying
Weight: 0.31
, exercising
Weight: 0.31
, cast
Weight: 0.31
, buying
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is big issue 1.00
is issue 0.92
is matter 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(voting, is big issue)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bullying, is big issue)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(voting, is big issue)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bullying, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(voting, is big issue)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(bullying, is big issue)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bullying, is big issue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(voting, is big issue)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(bullying, is issue)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(bullying, is issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(voting, is big issue)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(voting, is big issue)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(voting, is big issue)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(voting, is matter)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(voting, is big issue)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(voting, is matter)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(voting, is big issue)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(voting, is matter)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(voting, is big issue)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(voting, is matter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(voting, is big issue)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(voting, is big issue)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(voting, is big issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(voting, is big issue)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(voting, is big issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(voting, is big issue)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(bullying, is issue)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(voting, is big issue)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bullying, is big issue)