vulture: has physical part beak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.69
, scavenger
Weight: 0.61
, villain
Weight: 0.58
, predator
Weight: 0.56
Siblings condor
Weight: 0.62
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, owl
Weight: 0.36
, falcon
Weight: 0.36
, heron
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part beak 1.00
have strong beak 0.93
has physical part necks 0.77
have sharp claws 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(vulture, has physical part beak)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part beak)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part necks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part beak)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(vulture, has physical part beak)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(heron, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part beak)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(owl, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(owl, has physical part beak)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(heron, has physical part necks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part necks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(vulture, has physical part beak)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vulture, have strong beak)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(vulture, has physical part necks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(vulture, have sharp claws)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(vulture, has physical part necks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(vulture, has physical part necks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(vulture, has physical part necks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(vulture, have sharp claws)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(vulture, have strong beak)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(vulture, have sharp claws)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(vulture, have strong beak)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(vulture, have sharp claws)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vulture, have strong beak)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(vulture, has physical part beak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(vulture, has physical part beak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part beak)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(owl, has physical part beak)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part necks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(vulture, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)