waffle: cost more than pancakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, bread
Weight: 0.56
, product
Weight: 0.54
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, sausage
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.36
, custard
Weight: 0.35
, potato salad
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost more than pancakes 1.00
be more expensive than pancakes 0.97
be much more expensive than pancakes 0.96
be better than pancakes 0.95
be much better than pancakes 0.94
be healthier than pancakes 0.91
taste different than pancakes 0.90
be called waffles 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(waffle, cost more than pancakes)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(waffle, be more expensive than pancakes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(waffle, be much more expensive than pancakes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(waffle, be more expensive than pancakes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(waffle, be better than pancakes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(waffle, be better than pancakes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(waffle, be much better than pancakes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(waffle, be much more expensive than pancakes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(waffle, be healthier than pancakes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(waffle, be much better than pancakes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(waffle, be healthier than pancakes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(waffle, taste different than pancakes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(waffle, taste different than pancakes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(waffle, be better than pancakes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(waffle, be better than pancakes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(waffle, be called waffles)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(waffle, be much better than pancakes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(waffle, be much better than pancakes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(waffle, be more expensive than pancakes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(waffle, be much more expensive than pancakes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(waffle, be called waffles)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(waffle, be healthier than pancakes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(waffle, be called waffles)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(waffle, taste different than pancakes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(waffle, taste different than pancakes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(waffle, be much more expensive than pancakes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(waffle, be more expensive than pancakes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(waffle, be healthier than pancakes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(waffle, be called waffles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(waffle, cost more than pancakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(waffle, cost more than pancakes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(waffle, cost more than pancakes)