waiter: be at diner paid

Property	Similarity
be at diner paid	1.00
be at diner	0.96
be called waiter	0.77
get paid more than cooks	0.75
be in restaurants called	0.75

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(waiter, be at diner paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(waiter, be at diner)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(waiter, be at diner paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(waiter, be at diner)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(waiter, be at diner paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Salient(waiter, be at diner)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(waiter, be at diner paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(waiter, be in restaurants called)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(waiter, be at diner paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(waiter, be called waiter)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(waiter, be at diner paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at diner)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(waiter, be at diner paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(waiter, get paid more than cooks)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(waiter, be at diner paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(waiter, be called waiter)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(waiter, be at diner paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(waiter, get paid more than cooks)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(waiter, be at diner paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(waiter, be called waiter)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(waiter, be at diner paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(waiter, be in restaurants called)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(waiter, be at diner paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(waiter, be in restaurants called)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(waiter, be at diner paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(waiter, get paid more than cooks)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(waiter, be at diner paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(waiter, get paid more than cooks)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(waiter, be at diner paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(waiter, be in restaurants called)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(waiter, be at diner paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(waiter, be called waiter)

Parents	employee Weight: 0.69 , man Weight: 0.64 , worker Weight: 0.63 , job Weight: 0.62 , restaurant Weight: 0.59
Siblings	bartender Weight: 0.36 , italian restaurant Weight: 0.36 , receptionist Weight: 0.35 , policeman Weight: 0.35 , seafood restaurant Weight: 0.35

waiter: be at diner paid

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible