waiter: be at resturant

Related concepts

Parents	employee Weight: 0.69 , man Weight: 0.64 , worker Weight: 0.63 , job Weight: 0.62 , restaurant Weight: 0.59
Siblings	bartender Weight: 0.36 , italian restaurant Weight: 0.36 , receptionist Weight: 0.35 , policeman Weight: 0.35 , seafood restaurant Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at resturant	1.00
be at restaurant	0.85
be at in restaurant	0.84
be find in restaurant	0.82
service to person in restaraunt	0.81
be at cafe	0.77
serve diner	0.76
serve customer in restaurant	0.76
be used to eat italian cuisine	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(waiter, be at resturant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat italian cuisine)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(waiter, be at resturant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat italian cuisine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat italian cuisine)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(waiter, be at resturant)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(waiter, service to person in restaraunt)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(waiter, be at restaurant)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(waiter, service to person in restaraunt)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(waiter, be at restaurant)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(waiter, be at in restaurant)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(waiter, be find in restaurant)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(waiter, be at in restaurant)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(waiter, be find in restaurant)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at restaurant)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at in restaurant)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(waiter, be find in restaurant)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(waiter, be at cafe)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(waiter, serve customer in restaurant)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(waiter, serve diner)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(waiter, be at in restaurant)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(waiter, serve diner)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at cafe)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(waiter, be at cafe)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(waiter, serve customer in restaurant)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(waiter, service to person in restaraunt)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(waiter, serve customer in restaurant)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(waiter, be at restaurant)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(waiter, serve diner)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(waiter, serve customer in restaurant)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(waiter, be find in restaurant)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(waiter, serve diner)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(waiter, be at cafe)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(waiter, service to person in restaraunt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(waiter, be at resturant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat italian cuisine)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)