waiter: be in restaurants called

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.69
, man
Weight: 0.64
, worker
Weight: 0.63
, job
Weight: 0.62
, restaurant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bartender
Weight: 0.36
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, receptionist
Weight: 0.35
, policeman
Weight: 0.35
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in restaurants called 1.00
be at diner 0.76
be at diner paid 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(waiter, be in restaurants called)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(waiter, be in restaurants called)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(waiter, be in restaurants called)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at diner paid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(waiter, be in restaurants called)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(waiter, be at diner)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(waiter, be in restaurants called)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at diner)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(waiter, be in restaurants called)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(waiter, be at diner paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(waiter, be in restaurants called)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(waiter, be at diner)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(waiter, be in restaurants called)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(waiter, be at diner paid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(waiter, be in restaurants called)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(waiter, be at diner)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(waiter, be in restaurants called)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(waiter, be at diner paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(waiter, be in restaurants called)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(waiter, be in restaurants called)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be in restaurants called)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(waiter, be in restaurants called)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(waiter, be in restaurants called)