waiter: demand tips in america

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.69
, man
Weight: 0.64
, worker
Weight: 0.63
, job
Weight: 0.62
, restaurant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bartender
Weight: 0.36
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, receptionist
Weight: 0.35
, policeman
Weight: 0.35
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
demand tips in america 1.00
demand tips 0.93
need tips 0.87
get tips 0.85
work for tips 0.85
expect tips 0.83
complain about tips 0.83
rely on tips 0.81
deserve tips 0.81
entitled to tips 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bartender, get tips)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(bartender, get tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(bartender, get tips)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(waiter, demand tips in america)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(waiter, need tips)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(waiter, get tips)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(waiter, work for tips)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(waiter, expect tips)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(waiter, complain about tips)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(waiter, need tips)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(waiter, rely on tips)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(waiter, deserve tips)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(waiter, entitled to tips)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(waiter, rely on tips)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(waiter, get tips)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(waiter, need tips)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(waiter, expect tips)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(waiter, work for tips)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(waiter, rely on tips)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(waiter, get tips)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(waiter, work for tips)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(waiter, complain about tips)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(waiter, entitled to tips)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(waiter, expect tips)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(waiter, deserve tips)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(waiter, complain about tips)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(waiter, entitled to tips)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(waiter, deserve tips)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waiter, work for tips)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waiter, complain about tips)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(waiter, entitled to tips)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(waiter, get tips)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(waiter, expect tips)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(waiter, deserve tips)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(waiter, need tips)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(waiter, rely on tips)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(waiter, demand tips in america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(waiter, demand tips in america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(waiter, demand tips in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bartender, get tips)