waiter: entitled to tips

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.69
, man
Weight: 0.64
, worker
Weight: 0.63
, job
Weight: 0.62
, restaurant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bartender
Weight: 0.36
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, receptionist
Weight: 0.35
, policeman
Weight: 0.35
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
entitled to tips 1.00
need tips 0.90
get tips 0.90
work for tips 0.89
expect tips 0.86
deserve tips 0.86
complain about tips 0.86
demand tips 0.84
rely on tips 0.84
get tips from credit cards 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bartender, get tips)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(bartender, get tips)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(bartender, get tips)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(waiter, entitled to tips)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(waiter, need tips)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(waiter, get tips)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(waiter, work for tips)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(waiter, deserve tips)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(waiter, expect tips)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(waiter, complain about tips)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(waiter, rely on tips)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(waiter, need tips)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(waiter, get tips from credit cards)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(waiter, rely on tips)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(waiter, need tips)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(waiter, get tips)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(waiter, get tips)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(waiter, get tips from credit cards)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(waiter, work for tips)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(waiter, rely on tips)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waiter, work for tips)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(waiter, expect tips)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(waiter, deserve tips)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(waiter, expect tips)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(waiter, complain about tips)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waiter, get tips from credit cards)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waiter, complain about tips)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(waiter, work for tips)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(waiter, deserve tips)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(waiter, get tips from credit cards)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(waiter, complain about tips)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(waiter, get tips)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(waiter, expect tips)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(waiter, deserve tips)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(waiter, need tips)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(waiter, rely on tips)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(waiter, entitled to tips)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(waiter, entitled to tips)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(waiter, entitled to tips)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bartender, get tips)