waiter: need tips

Property	Similarity
need tips	1.00
get tips	0.98
work for tips	0.97
expect tips	0.94
complain about tips	0.92
demand tips	0.92
rely on tips	0.92
deserve tips	0.91
entitled to tips	0.90
demand tips in america	0.87

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(waiter, work for tips)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Plausible(waiter, get tips)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(waiter, work for tips)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(waiter, get tips)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(waiter, expect tips)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(waiter, complain about tips)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(waiter, rely on tips)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(waiter, expect tips)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(waiter, complain about tips)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(waiter, deserve tips)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(waiter, entitled to tips)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Plausible(waiter, entitled to tips)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(waiter, deserve tips)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(waiter, demand tips in america)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(waiter, rely on tips)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Plausible(waiter, demand tips in america)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(waiter, get tips)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(waiter, rely on tips)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(waiter, work for tips)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(waiter, rely on tips)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(waiter, expect tips)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(waiter, entitled to tips)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(waiter, complain about tips)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(waiter, deserve tips)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(waiter, demand tips in america)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(waiter, get tips)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(waiter, expect tips)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(waiter, entitled to tips)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(waiter, deserve tips)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(waiter, work for tips)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(waiter, demand tips in america)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(waiter, need tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(waiter, complain about tips)

Parents	employee Weight: 0.69 , man Weight: 0.64 , worker Weight: 0.63 , job Weight: 0.62 , restaurant Weight: 0.59
Siblings	bartender Weight: 0.36 , italian restaurant Weight: 0.36 , receptionist Weight: 0.35 , policeman Weight: 0.35 , seafood restaurant Weight: 0.35

waiter: need tips

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings